Low End PC Performance Guide: Battlefield 3

Gaming PC Builder is reader-supported. When using links on our site to make a purchase, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Built on DICE’s Frostbite 2 engine, the updated version of Frostbite used in Battlefield: Bad Company 2, Battlefield 3 is no doubt is the best looking game in the Battlefield series. The game looks so good it was nominated in every feature for “best graphics in 2011”. It was also so demanding that the developer DICE even stated that it would require an SLI/Crossfire dual-GPU set up to run the game at Ultra settings. But how does it scale to lower-end systems? Unfortunately, we haven’t seen one article to have tested and discussed this.

Test System & Requirements

ProcessorAMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz Dual-coreCore 2 Duo 2.4 GHz or Athlon X2 2.7 GHz
Memory3GB DDR2- 800MHz2GB
Video CardnVidia GeForce 9600GT 512MB DDR3(Green Edition)nVidia GeForce 8800 GT 512MB or AMD ATI Radeon 3870 512MB
Driver / Patch versionnVidia Forceware 285.62No installed updates.
Operating System / DirectXWindows 7 SP1 64-bit / DX 11Windows Vista (SP2) 32-bit / DX 10.0

Battlefield 3’s minimum requirements look favorable, on paper, and it looks to be identical to our system so we are really curious about how the game would run on these kinds of systems. Take note for those who have AMD Radeon cards, the game only requires DirectX 10, not necessarily DirectX 10.1 like Radeon 3870.

This game gives a great deal of beating for the CPU, running almost 100% all the time. Meanwhile, it looks to be light on memory, using only 1GB.

Image Comparison



Anisotropic Filtering




Ambient Occlusion


Effects Quality


Mesh Quality


Terrain Quality and Decoration




Motion Blur


Preset Quality


Texture QualityLowMediumHighUltra
Shadow QualityLowMediumHighUltra
Effects QualityLowMediumHighUltra
Mesh QualityLowMediumHighUltra
Terrain QualityLowMediumLowLow
Terrain DecorationLowMediumHighUltra
Anti-aliasing DeferredOffOffOff4xMSAA
Anti-aliasing PostOffMediumHighHigh
Motion BlurOffOffOnOn
Anisotropic Filtering2x (Custom 1x)4x16x16x
Ambient OcclusionOffSSAOHBAOHBAO

The above table is the comparison graphical preset settings. We used only 1x for the Anisotropic Filtering, instead of 2x in Low preset to set everything at its lowest level. This setting is what we used for image comparison and in benchmarking. Also take a look at Terrain Quality where it is set to low on High and Ultra Preset, it is because a DirectX 11 video card is needed to turn it to high and ultra, and we are only using Direct X 10 video card. As we took our time taking screenshots, we noticed that a particular setting, Mesh Quality, for example, doesn’t make any visual changes in some areas.


For our benchmarking process, we used FRAPS to measure the frames per second from the “Operation Shadowbreaker” mission. The video below is the benchmarking sequence we used.

AMD Athlon X2 5000+ | GeForce 9600GT | Battlefield 3




We didn’t bother benchmarking at Ultra preset as the results were already too low at High preset. We also didn’t have a DirectX 11 capable card to set everything at Ultra.

At 1280x1024 resolution, the results are too low and slow to be playable. Actually, in all of the line graphs, almost all frames were below 30. The fastest was at Low preset at 1024x768 with 27 fps average. There are some people who can tolerate this, and we gave this a shot to be more playable by tweaking and overclocking.

Tweaking and Overclocking

The game’s configuration file can be found in “My Documents\Battlefield 3\settings” and open the file “PROF_SAVE_profile” with WordPad. We apply the following settings:

GstRender.AmbientOcclusion 0
GstRender.AnisotropicFilter 0
GstRender.AntiAliasingDeferred 0
GstRender.AntiAliasingPost 0
GstRender.Brightness 0.500000
GstRender.Contrast 0.500000
GstRender.EffectsQuality 0
GstRender.Enlighten 0
GstRender.FieldOfView 10.000000
GstRender.FullscreenEnabled 1
GstRender.FullscreenScreen 0
GstRender.MeshQuality 0
GstRender.MeshQualityOld 0.700000
GstRender.MotionBlur 0.500000
GstRender.MotionBlurEnabled 0
GstRender.OverallGraphicsQuality 5
GstRender.ResolutionHeight 768
GstRender.ResolutionHertz 1114637337
GstRender.ResolutionWidth 1024
GstRender.ScreenSafeAreaHeight 0.950000
GstRender.ScreenSafeAreaWidth 0.950000
GstRender.ShaderQuality 2.000000
GstRender.ShadowQuality 0
GstRender.StereoConvergence 1.000000
GstRender.Stereoscopy 0
GstRender.TerrainQuality 0
GstRender.TextureQuality 0
GstRender.TransparentShadows 0
GstRender.UndergrowthQuality 0
GstRender.VSync 0
You can also type the following in notepad and save it as “User.cfg” and copy it to the Battlefield 3 game folder. These commands will be loaded automatically when a level is loaded. The commands can also be entered in game console (`).

RenderDevice.ForceRenderAheadLimit 8
RenderDevice.TripleBufferingEnable 0
GameTime.MaxVariableFps 90

We also managed the 3D settings of Battlefield 3 in the NVIDIA Control Panel.

As for overclocking, we overclocked both the GPU and the CPU to juice more frames out of these components. As mentioned earlier, the video is a Green Edition of 9600GT which basically a downclocked version of the original 9600GT and it doesn’t need a 6-pin power connector.


With the combination of tweaking and overclocking, we gained 9 fps on the average and 6 fps on the minimum. Looking at the line graph, the performance gain is evident – most of the frames per second are above 30 – compared to the stock performance. The game is now completely playable, at least at 1024x768. Playing it at a higher resolution or preset quality will negate these improvements. You can also do this on midrange or high-end systems to get more frames and make the gameplay smoother.

Battlefield 3 Side-by-Side OC Comparison



Although Battlefield 3 will technically run on its minimum requirements, it’s slow and frustrating – especially when you are playing online. This is a fast-paced shooting game and you don’t wanna play this anywhere below 30fps. Lucky for you if you know how to overclock and get around with configuration files; these will definitely give a boost in performance. But ultimately, the minimum requirement is practically invalid and you will definitely need upgrades or buy a new system if your current system is identical to the minimum requirements.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply

      This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.