The Fastest M.2 NVMe SSDs in September 2020

Gaming PC Builder is reader-supported. When using links on our site to make a purchase, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Samsung 980 PRO

Faster storage can shave seconds off most of your PC activities – from booting up your OS to loading apps and games. If you are currently booting from a hard drive, there is no other upgrade that will have such a noticeable effect on your user experience as a solid state drive (SSD).

But not all SSDs are created equal. If you have an available PCIe M.2 slot on your motherboard (desktop or laptop), then this is where to install your system drive. The best m.2 drives also use the modern storage interface protocol NVMe.

Table of Contents

What is NVMe and is it necessary?

NVMe example

Image credit: Intel

What SSD performance boils down to is how quickly it lets you move data from storage (non-volatile, slower) to DRAM (volatile, faster).

The NVMe protocol – short for non-volatile memory express – was created to make the most out of solid state drives in combination with the PCI Express (PCIe) interface. Its predecessor AHCI (paired with SATA) was originally intended for mechanical hard drives. The newer protocol includes many efficiency improvements to deal with parallel transfers and the low-latency nature of SSDs. If you are new to NVMe and want a primer on the concept, start with this introduction by Intel.

When shopping for a new SSD, it’s important to remember that M.2 is just a form factor that says nothing of performance. Some M.2 SSDs operate over the SATA interface and have the same performance limitations as a 2.5″ drive. If you have a relatively modern motherboard, it most likely has a PCIe/NVMe-capable (and therefore much faster) M.2 slot, so this is the type of drive to look for.

Fastest Gen4 Vs. Gen3 M.2 SSD

If you want an M.2 SSD that is consistently fast in all areas  – and don’t mind paying more – you can opt for a drive that uses MLC (multi-level cell) Flash memory chips, such as the Samsung 970 PRO. But if you don’t work with storage-heavy applications, you will not notice the difference compared to a drive based on more affordable 3D TLC (triple-level cell) memory. Today’s TLC-based drives can be as fast as MLC-based SSDs in most relevant areas thanks to some amazingly innovative use of caching technology.

As of now, the vast majority of the leading M.2 SSDs in both the PCIe 3/Gen3 and the PCIe 4/Gen4 categories use TLC memory. So for a fair comparison, we will stick to this memory type in our top picks of each:

Product
Fastest M.2 SSD (PCIe 4)
Sabrent 1TB Rocket NVMe 4.0 Gen4 PCIe M.2 Internal SSD Extreme Performance Solid State Drive (SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB)
Best PCIe 3.0 SSD
Samsung (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology
Image
Sabrent 1TB Rocket NVMe 4.0 Gen4 PCIe M.2 Internal SSD Extreme Performance Solid State Drive (SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB)
Samsung (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology
Sequential read (max., MB/s)
5,000
3,500
Sequential write (max., MB/s)
4,400
3,300
Random read IOPS (4K/QD32)
750,000
480,000
Random write IOPS (4K/QD32)
750,000
550,000
Average rating
User reviews
3,494 Reviews
8,302 Reviews
Warranty
5 Years
5 Years
Endurance rating (TBW)
1,800 TBW
600 TBW
Price
$199.98
$179.99
Fastest M.2 SSD (PCIe 4)
Product
Sabrent 1TB Rocket NVMe 4.0 Gen4 PCIe M.2 Internal SSD Extreme Performance Solid State Drive (SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB)
Image
Sabrent 1TB Rocket NVMe 4.0 Gen4 PCIe M.2 Internal SSD Extreme Performance Solid State Drive (SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB)
Sequential read (max., MB/s)
5,000
Sequential write (max., MB/s)
4,400
Random read IOPS (4K/QD32)
750,000
Random write IOPS (4K/QD32)
750,000
Average rating
User reviews
3,494 Reviews
Warranty
5 Years
Endurance rating (TBW)
1,800 TBW
Price
$199.98
Best PCIe 3.0 SSD
Product
Samsung (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology
Image
Samsung (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology
Sequential read (max., MB/s)
3,500
Sequential write (max., MB/s)
3,300
Random read IOPS (4K/QD32)
480,000
Random write IOPS (4K/QD32)
550,000
Average rating
User reviews
8,302 Reviews
Warranty
5 Years
Endurance rating (TBW)
600 TBW
Price
$179.99

Last update on 2020-09-29 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Fastest PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD: Sabrent Rocket Gen4

Sabrent Rocket Gen4If and only if you have a motherboard that supports PCI Express 4.0 (or plan to upgrade soon), then this is a suitable SSD. At this point, only AMD X570 motherboards equipped with a Ryzen 3000-series CPU (or 3rd-gen Threadripper) support the interface in the consumer space. As of the mid-2020, all PCIe 4.0-capable SSDs including the Rocket Gen4 are based on the same Phison PS5016-E16 controller and 3D TLC NAND combo, resulting in roughly the same performance. The other, nearly identical drives (among a few others) are:

PCIe 4.0 SSDs are known to run quite hot compared to their PCIe 3.0 counterparts, so unless you have a motherboard with an included heat spreader (often supplied with X570 boards), this might be a useful addition to a Gen4 SSD. The Corsair MP600 is available with or without a heat spreader, as is the Sabrent Rocket Gen4, while the Seagate Firecuda 520 ships without one. Some drives, such as the XPG Gammix S50, are only available with a heat spreader. Bear in mind that these heatsinks add to the devices’ dimensions and will usually not fit in a laptop.

When combined with the right motherboard, you will get exceptional sequential transfer rates of up to 5 GB/s with any of the above Gen4 drives. Again, this is only with a compatible motherboard/CPU combo – otherwise, these drives will max out at PCIe 3.0 speeds, or about 3,500 MB/s.

Check prices (Rocket Gen4): Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Samsung 980 PRO

Note: If you are planning to buy a Gen4 M.2 SSD in the second half of 2020, you should also be aware of the Samsung 980 series, which will launch at some point before the end of this year. According to an accidentally published product page, the Samsung 980 PRO will outperform the current range of Phison-based SSDs with a sizeable margin – reaching speeds of up to 7,000 MB/s (sequential read). If the leaked product page is correct, this drive will use TLC NAND and come in 250 GB, 500 GB, and 1 TB capacities at launch (no exact date has been announced).

Best PCIe 3.0 NVMe M.2 SSD: Samsung 970 PRO

No single drive will take home the crown as the fastest M.2. SSD in every benchmark or practical use case. However, our choice as the best general performer in the PCIe 3.0 segment in the second quarter of 2020 is the MLC-based Samsung 970 PRO – a drive that still tops many performance charts in the M.2 PCI Express category.

It’s also considered one of the most reliable. Samsung’s performance and reliability track record in the SSD segment has been almost flawless for nearly a decade, so this drive is a very comfortable recommendation.

The 970 PRO comes with Samsung’s proprietary controller and MLC chips, as well as an excellent endurance rating of 1,200 TBW (1TB) or 600 TBW (512GB). Unfortunately, the 970 PRO is only available in two capacities: 512 GB and 1 TB, which limits your choices. It may also be a somewhat questionable choice when looking at the performance/$ equation, since the cost per GB is well above average.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Read more about the 970 PRO in our SSD database >>

Best Value/Performance (PCIe 3.0): Samsung 970 EVO Plus

This will ultimately depend on today’s prices for the best M.2 SSDs on the market (scroll down for a more comprehensive list). Nevertheless, Samsung’s 970 EVO Plus is much more affordable than the PRO but very close in terms of raw performance. Although it doesn’t use premium MLC NAND, this drive is among the very best – and will likely remain so until we see more competition in the PCIe 4.0 segment.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Read more about the 970 EVO Plus in our SSD database >>

On the same note, also consider the more affordable yet well-rounded PCIe 3.0 Sabrent Rocket which offers an attractive mix of value and performance. This drive comes with a Phison E12 controller and Toshiba TLC NAND – a high-end combo that puts it nearly on par with the 970 EVO but at a significantly lower cost.

12 of the Fastest M.2 PCIe NVMe SSDs in 2020

There are alternatives to all of the above of course. Some of which could be better options if the price is right, so don’t stop reading just yet. In the following list we’ve put together some of the best-performing, recently released drives. They are ordered by sequential performance first, random second. Because of the drives’ different controllers and memory types, these numbers are only an indication of actual performance.

# NameMax. sequential read/write (MB/s)4K random read/write performance (IOPS)Endurance rating (terabytes written)Check Price
1Sabrent Rocket Gen4 (1TB)5000/4400750K/750K1800 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
2Gigabyte Aorus Gen4 (1TB)5000/4400750K/700K1800 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
3Corsair MP600 Gen4 (1TB)4950/4250680K/600K1800 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
4Samsung 970 PRO (1TB)3500/2700500K/500K1200 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
5Samsung 970 EVO PLUS (1TB)3500/3300600K/550K600 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
6Adata XPG SX8200 Pro (1TB)3500/3000390K/380K640 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
7PNY XLR8 CS3030 (1TB)3500/3000N/A1665 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
8HP EX950 (1TB)3500/2900410K/370K650 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
9Corsair Force MP510 (960 GB)3480/3000280K/700K720 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
10WD Black SN750 (1TB)3430/3000515K/560K600 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
11Intel SSD 760p (1TB)3230/1625340K/275K576 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK
12Intel Optane SSD 800P (118GB)1450/640250K/140K365 TBWAmazon
Newegg
Amazon UK

Remember that the Gen4 SSDs on top of the list requires a PCI Express 4.0-capable motherboard (X570 chipset) to run at full speed. In other words: don’t pay extra for a Gen4 SSD unless you own a suitable motherboard or plan to upgrade soon.

High-End Alternative: Intel Optane 800p

Intel M.2 SSDThe last drive on our list is also a high-end option. Although its sequential performance might not sound like much, Intel’s Optane 800p is faster than all other M.2 SSDs in certain areas. Its extremely low latency makes random performance at low queue depths particularly good, which is an advantage for a system drive. The reason why it’s hard to compare it with other SSDs is that it uses Intel’s proprietary 3D XPoint memory instead of ‘normal’ NAND Flash.

Unfortunately, it also comes with a much higher cost/GB than competing drives and is only available in two tiny capacities – 58 GB and 118 GB. Read more about it here, or head straight to AnandTech for the most detailed review online.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Which is the Best M.2 SSD for Gaming?

For the average user, the difference between an SSD and a hard drive in terms of user experience is very clearly noticeable. The effect of shifting from one type of SSD to another will not be nearly as dramatic.

All storage-intensive tasks that move lots of files around will be affected by an SSDs capability. However, a faster SSD will not necessarily shorten loading times in games by large amounts. Here’s an interesting test from the web, comparing an M.2 PCIe SSD (970 Pro) versus an older 2.5″ SATA SSD (plus a mechanical hard drive) when loading various games:

SSD game loading test: fastest Samsung 970pro vs OLD SATA SSD vs HDD

Here’s a summary of the data:

GameLoading from
HDD
Loading from
2.5" SATA SSD
Loading from
970 Pro (PCIe/NVMe)
Decrease/Increase,
(NVMe Vs SATA)
Destiny 2
45s31s29s-6%
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided71s27s21s-22%
DOOM65s49s47s-4%
Civilization 627s18s17s-6%
Far Cry 525s10s11s+10%
Path of Exile23s3s3s+0%
World of Warcraft36s7s6s-14%
Skyrim Special Edition20s9s12s+33%
Witcher 313s7s5s-29%
Total325s161s151s-6%

Source: YouTube user Alexandr iuneWind

With these results in mind, it is probably safe to assume that a comparison of individual high-end M.2 PCIe SSDs will result in small differences as far as gaming is concerned. The usual price/performance calculation will serve you well. Of course, all seconds saved add up to minutes and hours in the long run, so a fast M.2 NVMe SSD is still a key component in a high-end PC. But in most cases, you should not expect the sort of radical performance gains that you see when coming from a traditional hard drive.

Will it Work in my Laptop/Desktop PC?

For the listed drives to work with your computer, it must have the proper slot and support for PCIe/NVMe. But there may be exceptions: Even without an M.2 slot on your (desktop) motherboard, you may still be able to use one in a full-size PCIe x4 slot using an adapter. But if you want to run your OS from the drive, your motherboard must still support booting from PCIe, which is no guarantee with older motherboards.

All recent, high-end ATX-size motherboards, on the other hand, include at least one M.2 slot and will be able to run a modern SSD at PCIe 3.0 speeds at a minimum. With an older board, you might not be so lucky. In any event, it’s always best to check the manual before buying a new drive.

Keying and Sizes

M.2 SSDs (and other M.2 cards) come in different sizes and some motherboards – particularly in laptops – will only hold a drive up to a certain size. They also have different sets of notches (keying) that will prevent you from installing it the wrong way.

M.2 Keying and Size

Three different key types or ‘notch styles’ may be used by M.2 SSDs: B, M or B&M. The socket can be either B or M, but not both.

High-end SSDs, as well as recent motherboards, will have to use an M-key slot, as this is the only type that provides four lanes of bandwidth, or 20 Gbit/s, also known as PCIe x4. B-key supports ‘only’ PCIe x2, or 10 Gbit/s.

On many motherboards, the connector itself or the PCB next to it will be labeled with the keying. Otherwise, check the specs or the manual. Likewise, M.2 card length might be stamped on the board, looking something like this:

High-capacity drives have additional memory chips mounted on the card and may require more space in some cases. The M.2 standard allows for cards of five different lengths, with the number format meaning width-length in millimeters. All sizes are the same width, so the two most common, 2280 and 2242, are 80mm and 42mm long, respectively (and so on). All sizes:

  • 2230
  • 2242
  • 2260
  • 2280
  • 22110

Not all motherboards – and much less all laptops – can accommodate the longest cards and some might not even support the common 2280 size (the format used by most of the drives listed above). 22110 drives are however very rare.

Also, don’t confuse M.2 and mSATA, which is another, older standard. These slots may look similar on the motherboard, but they’re not compatible. M.2 SSDs may also use the SATA interface, but that doesn’t mean it’s an mSATA drive.

Yes, it really is a bit confusing, but fortunately, M.2 2280 is the most common standard by far, so it’s actually hard to get it wrong. But just to be safe:

Checklist Before Buying an M.2 SSD

  • Check the drive’s interface and M.2 keying, e.g. B+M-key/M-key (all PCIe x4 SSDs are M-key).
  • Make sure it matches the slot on your motherboard or in your laptop. You can usually find this information on the specs page.
  • Also ensure that the length of the drive is supported, e.g. 2280 or 2242 (numbers in bold are millimeters).

To sum things up about keying and interfaces: it might sound complicated, but really isn’t. If you are building a high-end PC based on a Z170, Z270, B350/B450, X370/X470 chipset, it will likely have an M-key slot. And if so, most of the popular M-key or B+M-key drives will work. But there are a few exceptions, so it’s best to double-check.

Choosing the Right Capacity

You can hardly ever have too much storage space, but all of it doesn’t have to be super fast. There is no reason to use an expensive, high-end SSD to store family photos or your Steam library backups.

Speaking for myself, a primary 1 TB SSD is enough to hold the stuff I use on a regular basis. That includes the OS, all work-related apps, and a few games – basically what I want quick access to on a regular basis. The rest is mostly distributed on some affordable terabytes of hard drive space.

What capacity you need is always a personal question. If you just want a really fast computer for work (and who doesn’t?), you can probably get by with as little as 128 GB and use hard drives for the rest. However, when looking at the price/performance ratio (performance is usually improved in larger capacities), 240 or 256 GB drives offer a much more attractive entry-level price point. If you want to install any larger number of games, 1 TB should be considered a minimum size.

Most importantly, you want to boot from your fastest drive. That means it must be able to store the OS and all of its associated files (such as caches and swap). And it’s not that much:

  • Windows 10 (64-bit): 20GB
  • MacOs Catalina: 12.5GB
  • Ubuntu 20.04: 25GB
  • Manjaro 18/19: 30GB
  • Linux Mint 20: 20GB
  • Elementary OS 5 (Debian/Ubuntu): 15GB
  • Fedora 30 Workstation: 10GB
  • OpenSuse Tumbleweed: 40GB

Those numbers may or may not be a minimum requirement, but also add – at the very least – the amount of RAM in your system to be on the safe side (to make room for the swap file). Office apps are usually not that demanding either, with MS Office taking up about 4 GB of space on your SSD. Games tend to use a lot more but can range in size from a few hundred megabytes to dozens of gigabytes, so there is no simple answer. On the other hand, loading games from a slower device (but preferably still an SSD) is still a viable option, as seen above.

As a PC gaming enthusiast since the 3dfx Voodoo era, Jesper has had time to experiment with a fair few FPS-improving PC parts over the years. His job at GPCB is to test and evaluate hardware, mainly focusing on GPUs and storage devices.

36 Comments
    • Whatt is the best seagate firecuda 520 or samsung 980 pro

      • Hi Mohamed,
        The 980 Pro is considerably faster (theoretically) than the Firecuda 520 and all other drives with the same controller (until now, all PCIe Gen4 SSDs).

        In terms of sequential speeds, the 980 Pro offers up to 7,000 MB/s (read) and 5,000 MB/s (write), compared to the FireCuda’s 5,000/4,400 MB/s. Random performance is 1,000,000 IOPS (Samsung) Vs. 760,000 IOPS (Seagate).

        This large difference will however not be anywhere near as apparent as the numbers indicate outside of synthetic benchmarks. But it’s definitely faster overall.

    • Thanks Brad for spotting the typo! Changed it.
      There will probably be another few years before these things are a thousand times as fast… 🙂
      /Jesper

      • hello, Jesper!! great article with great info!

        I’m an audio professional and some of my DAW sound/sample libraries require that I install them on SSD drives. to keep from taking up space on my boot drive, I’m looking to move them to external storage and the an NVMe SSD seems to be the smart route.

        I’ll be connecting via USB 3 on a 2018 Mac Mini and putting the SSD in a USB 3 enclosure. I’m currently looking at the Samsung 970 PRO or EVO (512GB), but can you recommend a drive and enclosure combo where I can max read speeds and reliability at a reasonable price? thanks in advance!!!

  1. All the links for Samsung EVO (and what I can find online) are for PCIe Gen3 drives, not Gen4

  2. As of now, there are still no Samsung EVO (or PRO) M.2 drives on the market that run on Gen4. The Gen4 Samsung 980 PRO was announced at CES this year, but I’ve seen nothing of a release date yet.
    See:
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/15352/ces-2020-samsung-980-pro-pcie-40-ssd-makes-an-appearance

  3. Your specs are all wrong, for chart under heading, “”12 of the Fastest M.2 PCIe NVMe SSDs in 2020″” Please update!

    They should be this: (consider adding Gen3 for comparison)

    Gigabyte Aorus PCIe Gen4 (500GB) – 5000/4400
    Gigabyte Aorus PCIe Gen3 (500GB) – 3500/2500

    Sabrent Rocket PCIe Gen4 (500GB) – 5000/2500
    Sabrent Rocket PCIe Gen3 (500GB) – 3400/2500

    ADD:
    Corsair MP510 PCIe Gen3 (480GB) – 3480/3000

    All the rest seemed okay…

    • Thanks for your comment. I believe that you are mistakenly referring to the read/write specs for the 1TB+ models, which are higher than the 500GB ones listed here (write speeds in particular).

      That said, it would make more sense to compare the 1TB drives, which is probably the most common capacity these days. I’ll change this in the next update.

  4. Dont know how the Seagate NVME PCIe 4.0 Firecuda 1TB didnt make this list. It’s the fastest by far in real world file transfer speeds. Blew the Sabrent away in a side by side comparison video I saw. They all have the same Phison controller but Seagate uses its own proprietary firmware or something.

  5. The Addlink S90 should be included on the list near the top if not the number one spot. It performs even faster than what it advertises.

    • 3600 TBW is for the 2TB model. 1TB drives are compared in the table and the Corsair MP600 1TB offers half of the 2TB so 1800 TBW.

  6. “If you just want a really fast computer for work (and who doesn’t?), you can probably get by with as little as 128 GB and use hard drives for the rest. ”

    Price difference of 128GB and 240GB is only ~10 euros so for normal user there is no point to get only 128 GB. Going 128 GB needs special conditions.

  7. This article was really helpful. I want to buy an M.2 SSD for my Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-50S9 (Part Number NX.VFUAL.001) but I wanted to know which ones were compatible with my device. Is any M.2 PCIe 2280 going to work with my laptop? I was trying to buy some models which didn’t appear in userbenchmark so I’m not completly sure if they’ll work or not.

    For example I was wondering if some of these are compatible with my laptop:
    Kingston SA2000M8/250G 250GB
    XPG SX6000 PCIE GEN3X2 M.2 2280
    SSD 256GB SEAGATE M.2 2280 BARRACUDA 510
    ADATA SWORDFISH PCIe Gen3x4 M.2 2280

    Thanks in advance!

  8. You are just quoting advertised speeds and that is completely misleading. I can tell you, Samsung drives don’t perform anywhere near the advertised speeds. I have tested 21 drives. The random speeds are particularly poor. Overpriced trash. I expect all other drives will experience similar speed differences. What really matters is real world performance, and I’ve yet to see a NVMe drive that performs anywhere near the marketed speeds.

    • Thanks for taking the time to comment. I agree that max. sequential speeds don’t paint the whole picture but they still tend to be quite accurate when tested with e.g. ATTO. As for the Samsung drives, I’ve also tested most of them since the 830 and they have usually been among the best in most areas (except when compared to the Intel Optane drives in terms of latency/random data).

  9. Thanks , very helpful article
    what about Toshiba like :Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 2TB Internal M.2 2280 NVMe Solid State Drive (SSD)
    This wasn’t included in comparison, my Dell XPS came originally equipped with same Toshiba but 1TB, I am trying to upgrade to 2TB, I was thinking between Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB , Sabrent Sabrent 2TB Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 Internal SSD High Performance Solid State Drive (SB-ROCKET-2TB)and Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 2TB, what would you advise ?
    Thanks , appreciated

    • Thanks, Walid!
      Your current Toshiba XG5-P is a high-end OEM SSD, so it’s probably safe to say that you won’t experience any real-world difference outside of synthetic benchmarks with either the Samsung or the Sabrent (or a 2TB XG5-P).

      The Samsung EVO Plus is a great drive that performs well in almost every area, but personally I would have opted for one of the others at this time due to the large price difference and small real-world performance difference.

      Here’s a review that compares the Sabrent with the Samsung in the 2TB capacities: https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/9434/sabrent-rocket-nvme-2tb-ssd/index.html (I haven’t seen any review of the XG5-P yet).

  10. Has anyone done a good performance shootout ranking PCIe 4.0 SSDs? Preferably the 2tB models?
    I have the Gigabyte AORUS 2tB and I’d like to know how it stacks up against the others. I bought it because the specs looked so good, and I am VERY impressed with its performance. Windows 10 boots up lightning fast, and games are super speedy too.

  11. I have to say you are the first tech writer who’s back doesn’t go up and get all snotty and defensive when someone has a dissenting opinion. You handle yourself with intelligence and diplomacy. Kudos to you and thank you for your informative articles.

  12. jb, excellent work- info is spot on.
    please update with the additional NVME’s ..
    ive been performing similar ATTO and Crystal Disk tests. the only mfg that actually understates the r/w speed is crucial. please verify the P5 NVME 500 & 1TB 2280’s ..let me know your thoughts and if i can assist.
    sped

  13. Crucial P5 500Gb & 1TB 2280

  14. Is it usually possible to move the M.2 plastic post on motherboards, to accommodate the various lengths? I’ve never encountered this before and while it looks possible (mine is a pale blue plastic post), I’m reluctant to break it, if they’re normally immovable

    • You are absolutely right, good point! On many motherboards, the post is a metal screw that can simply be moved to another position. The issue rarely comes up though since the vast majority of consumer M.2 drives use the 2280 form factor. Maybe this will change once really large capacities are more common.

  15. sorry for the duplicate comment. I noticed I said I was connecting via USB 3. it actually is USB-C. full corrected comment is below. thanks again!
    —–
    hello, Jesper!! great article with great info!

    I’m an audio professional and some of my DAW sound/sample libraries require that I install them on SSD drives. to keep from taking up space on my boot drive, I’m looking to move them to external storage and the NVMe SSD seems to be the smartest route.

    I’ll be connecting via USB-C to a 2018 Mac Mini and putting the SSD in a USB-C enclosure. I’m currently looking at the Samsung 970 PRO or EVO (512GB), but can you recommend a drive and enclosure combo (for external storage, not booting) where I can get max read speeds and reliability at a reasonable price? thanks in advance!!!

    • Hi Garfield, and many thanks!
      Although you could theoretically connect an external Thunderbolt drive to your 2018 Mac Mini, I would personally not spend money on anything that fast, and certainly no 970 PRO/EVO (which I would only use as an internal drive) + enclosure.

      I don’t know about your exact working environment of course, but I am currently using Logic (audio recording + samples) on a 2012 MacBook Pro (SATA SSD) with no lag whatsoever.

      It’s unlikely that you would have an issue with any external SSD on the market. My tip would be to simply maximize the amount of GB/$

      • I appreciate the info, suggestions and response!!

        I used to run Logic Pro X from a 2012 MBP as well with a Samsung SSD and it was a great solution!! the 2018 Mini has DEF been an upgrade, and the Logic Pro, Studio One and Native Instruments samples are currently on an external 7200rpm and running with no problems.

        however, my instruments from UAD LUNA are suggested to run on SSD (from UAD) and I use several sample-based Acustica Audio plugins that sound great, but are VERY heavy on the computer both in CPU load and space required. my thought was that the fastest possible SSD drive solution would be the smart bet. also, since the Samsungs are top notch in terms of quality, and I’ve installed them in both of the 2012 MBP in our home with great results, I just assumed I’d stay in the Samsung family… so in that scenario, you still say the Samsung EVO would be the least efficient option (because of cost)? thanks again!

        • Thanks for the clarification, though I’m not familiar with those plugins, so I won’t pretend that your situation is perfectly clear to me 🙂

          I still get the impression that storage bandwidth might be a lesser issue, but if you are intent on taking this route then I agree that a 970 EVO/EVO Plus would be one of the best-performing options.

  16. Keep in mind once PC games (and hardware) start supporting DirectStorage, a good NVMe drive will become a larger asset. I suspect games developed for the next-gen consoles will see optional support for DS on PC. Obviously the impact will vary based on how aggressively developers use it, your game settings (textures and so forth that would exceed available RAM), and how much memory you have to play with in the first place.

    Consoles will still benefit the most, obviously. They have a comparatively small amount of total available RAM, and they have fixed specs, so developers can really fine tune streaming algorithms. They’ll have to be more conservative on PC, and it will be optional, so the impact won’t be as large for many (most?) configs.

    Even so, I’m glad to see them bring DirectStorage to PC, it’s about time we actually taxed these high-falutin’ NVMe drives in-game.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.