WD Blue SN550 1TB Review: Affordable NVMe Performance
Gaming PC Builder is reader-supported. When using links on our site to make a purchase, we may earn an affiliate commission.
The WD Blue SN550 is the latest (2020) variety in Western Digital’s Blue range of M.2 SSDs. It replaces last year’s SN500, which was only available in 250GB and 500GB capacities. It should also not be confused with the similarly-named WD Blue 3D NAND, which is a significantly slower SATA SSD in the M.2 form factor. This doesn’t change the fact that WD has used the Blue label for its value/mainstream storage products for many years, and the SN550 is no exception.
Introduction: WD Blue SN550 1TB
At around $100 for the 1 TB capacity, the WD Blue SN550 is not intended to compete with the best M.2 NVMe SSDs like the WD Black SN750/SN850 or Samsung’s PRO/EVO lineup. Instead, it challenges other entry-level NVMe drives such as the QLC-based Sabrent Rocket Q, Intel 665p, and Crucial P1. However, the WD Blue SN550 uses higher-end 96-layer TLC NAND from WD’s subsidiary SanDisk.
|WD Blue SN550||250GB|
|Form Factor||M.2 2280||M.2 2280||M.2 2280|
|PCIe 3.0 x4/|
|PCIe 3.0 x4/|
|PCIe 3.0 x4/
|Controller||WD Proprietary||WD Proprietary||WD Proprietary|
|Memory||SanDisk 96L TLC||SanDisk 96L TLC||SanDisk 96L TLC|
|Sequential Read||2,400 MB/s||2,400 MB/s||2,400 MB/s|
|Sequential Write||950 MB/s||1,750 MB/s||1,750 MB/s|
|Random Read||170,000 IOPS||300,000 IOPS||410,000 IOPS|
|Random Write||135,000 IOPS||240,000 IOPS||405,000 IOPS|
|Endurance||150 TBW||300 TBW||600 TBW|
|Warranty||5 Years||5 Years||5 Years|
As this is an entry-level drive, the WD Blue SN550 has to make do without a DRAM buffer and its specifications are not comparable to high-end PCIe/NVMe SSDs. On the other hand, it is still about four times as fast (theoretically) as any SATA SSD – while actually being slightly cheaper than some of the popular 2.5″ SATA alternatives. That makes the SN550 and other affordable NVMe SSDs attractive for anyone with an M.2 slot to spare.
WD Blue SN550 1TB Benchmarks
Synthetic benchmarks are always interesting, but from a user experience perspective, they will not tell you all that much about perceived performance. Although they are usually the main selling point for high-end NVMe SSDs, very high max. sequential transfer rates will not be a deciding factor for the user experience in an average office or gaming PC. User workloads are typically a complex mix of random and sequential access patterns. For this reason, we try to use a mix of benchmarks with an emphasis on user-centric tests.
AS SSD scores tend to be relatively inconsistent, but it’s still a useful tool for measuring transfer rates with incompressible data. As you might expect, the WD Blue SN550 is not topping the charts as far as sequential transfers go.
CrystalDiskMark is another lightweight tool that measures sequential performance as well as random performance at different queue depths. Again, the WD Blue SN550’s sequential read transfer rate struggles to keep up with the compared drives (as it should, based on the specifications).
In the 4K tests, the SN550 switches place with the Samsung 980. It also compares well with other PCIe 3.0 SSDs except the high-end FireCuda 510.
Response Times/Latency (Anvil’s Storage Utilities)
The importance of low latency is highlighted by the fact that Intel’s Optane (3D XPoint) SSDs are still well ahead of the competition in many mixed workloads. This results in improved performance where it counts, such as in loading times and other areas that affect the user experience. Here, the SN550 is mostly in line with the other PCIe 3.0 drives.
Loading Times (PCMark 10, FF XIV)
When comparing loading times with different SSDs, the differences are often surprisingly small, indicating that the bottlenecks may be found elsewhere in the system. To test loading times without having to resort to a stopwatch, PCMark 10’s app start-up (cold start) should be fairly indicative of what to expect in the real world.
Unsurprisingly, the high-end SSDs are faster, but the affordable WD Blue SN550 holds up quite well compared to other budget M.2 drives. It is (very) slightly faster than the more expensive Samsung 980, for example.
The Final Fantasy XIV Shadowbringers benchmark loads five different scenes/levels and provides a total loading time. A mechanical 7,200 rpm 3.5″ hard drive has been added for perspective. Once again, the SN550 is largely on par with other budget drives.
Conclusion: Great Entry-Level PCIe/NVMe SSD
Considering that the cost per GB is about half that of current performance leaders such as the Samsung 980 PRO and the WD Black SN850, there is no question that the WD Blue SN550 offers great value. Although some synthetic benchmarks may tell you otherwise, performance in most real-world office or gaming scenarios is a lot greater than the different specifications imply.
Also, you are essentially getting a PCIe/NVMe drive for just slightly more than the price of an average 2.5″ SATA SSD. And thanks to the TLC (triple-level cell) NAND, it’s also noteworthy that the endurance rating is comparable to the high-end alternatives at equivalent capacities. This is usually not the case with other affordable alternatives based on less durable QLC (quad-level cell) NAND.
If you are looking for a fast NVMe boot drive within a similar budget, your choices right now are either an entry-level 1TB drive like this one or a high-end 500GB SSD like the Sabrent Rocket Gen4 (PCIe 4.0) or Samsung 970 EVO Plus (PCIe 3.0). If you opt for the former, the SN550 looks like one of the best alternatives at this point.
The WD Blue SN550 Rocket Q offers considerably improved performance for about the same price as the WD Blue SATA model.
- Excellent value
- High endurance rating
- More than decent real-world performance
- No 2TB version
- Less impressive sequential performance